Skip to page navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

OPM.gov / Policy / Pay & Leave / Claim Decisions / Compensation & Leave
Skip to main content

Washington, DC

U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Compensation Claim Decision
Under section 3702 of title 31, United States Code

[Name]
U.S. Air Force Central Command
Shaw Air Force Base
Sumter, South Carolina
Back pay for performing higher-graded duties.
Denied
Denied
19-0024

Damon B. Ford
Compensation and Leave Claims
Program Manager
Agency Compliance and Evaluation
Merit System Accountability and Compliance


12/10/2019


Date

The claimant occupies a Program Analyst, GS-343-12, position in the United States Air Force (AF), at Shaw Air Force Base (AFB), in South Carolina. He asserts the agency failed to compensate him properly for performing the higher-graded duties of an Acting Division Chief between December 2017 and September 2019. He requests the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) settle his claim for "compensation arrears" for higher-graded work performed during the aforementioned temporary assignments. We received the claim request on August 28, 2019. For the reasons discussed herein, the claim is denied.

Section 7121(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code (U.S.C.), directs that except as provided elsewhere in the statute, the grievance procedures in a negotiated collective bargaining agreement (CBA) shall be the exclusive administrative remedy for resolving matters that fall within the coverage of the CBA. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has found the plain language of 5 U.S.C. 7121 (a)(1) to be clear, and as such, limits the administrative resolution of a Federal employee’s grievance to the negotiated procedures set forth in the CBA. Mudge v. United States, 308 F.3d 1220, 1228 (Fed. Cir. 2002). Further, the Federal Circuit also found that all matters not specifically excluded from the grievance process by the CBA fall within the coverage of the CBA. Id. at 1231. As such, OPM cannot assert jurisdiction over the compensation or leave claims of Federal employees who are or were subject to a negotiated grievance procedure (NGP) under a CBA between the employee’s agency and labor union for any time during the claim period. Unless the matter is or was specifically excluded from the CBA’s NGP. See 5 CFR 178.101(b).

Documentation provided by the employing agency (i.e., Standard Form 50 showing the claimant’s bargaining unit status in block 37) shows he occupied a bargaining unit position during the period of the claim. The Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between Shaw AFB, S.C. and the American Federation of Government Employees Local number 1872, dated April 2003, covering the claimant during his employment with the agency and in effect during the period of the claim, does not specifically exclude compensation issues from the NGP (Article 37). Therefore, this claim must be construed as covered by the NGP the claimant was subject to during the claim period. Accordingly, OPM has no jurisdiction to adjudicate this claim. Therefore, the claim is denied.

This settlement is final. No further administrative review is available within OPM. Nothing in this settlement limits the claimant’s right to bring an action in an appropriate United States court.

Back to Top

Control Panel